Occasionally, content providers like to tweak their stories after they go out. Usually it’s because of a typo, but sometimes there’s more to the story. A very recent example is Wired: it published a story on hybrid vehicles, and shortly afterward changed the headline. My feed reader picked it up as two different stories, since it has two different headlines. The difference in this example, as in many others, is instructive:
Anyway, keep your eyes open!
I’ve been reading David Mamet‘s new book, called “The Wicked Son”, which is about anti-Semitism – specifically, about Jewish anti-Semitism. It’s an incredible read, especially since he’s in the avant-garde theater crowd, where he most likely encounters many of the disaffected Jews his book is aimed at. In other words, he knows exactly what he’s dealing with, unlike many rabbis, who are simply not in contact with the self-hating Jews that Mamet chastises in this book.
The book also surprised me since Mamet’s movie “State and Main” featured a stereotypical ultra-greedy Yiddish speaking film producer. It was meant as satire, but after watching it, I suspected Mamet of exactly the sort of perspective he is criticizing here (even though I thought the movie was hysterically funny). After reading this book, I’m much more willing to give Mamet benefit of the doubt. The movie, which is about a Hollywood movie shooting “on location” in Vermont, and what kind of effect Hollywood can have on a small town, may be playing to our expectations of what might happen in that situation, as opposed to what actually does happen. Or maybe Mamet has simply changed his outlook since making the movie in 2000. Anyway, here’s another take on the Jewish aspect of “State and Main”.
Also, here’s an article by Mamet on Israel’s war with Lebanon (written while it was happening). It’s not nearly as poetic as the book (which is partially styled after Talmudic questions and answers), but it’s a good taste of how he sees things.
Anyway, I’ve always been a Mamet fan (“Glengarry Glen Ross” is among my favorite movies), and it’s very interesting to see him contribute to contemporary Jewish thought. It’s a book well worth reading.
The proof is that they posted this story:
Amputated Arm Moved to Groin
p.s. Poor S.O.B… that is not a good day.
p.p.s. Yes, I’m aware that my posting this means that I hate you, too.
The Minnesota Daily has a nice article on why Net Neutrality is so important as, yes, a regulation.
I just saw this via Google News: Sen. Obama mulls bid for White House in 2008. He certainly doesn’t have the political baggage that Hillary Clinton does, for example, and he’s new enough to Washington to still be considered an “outsider”. It could make for a very interesting race in 2008…
I got back into Battlestar Galactica a few weeks ago (I finally caught up). The 3rd season is AWESOME so far. The end of the 2nd season was a little slow up until (but not including) the last episode of the season, and I was getting a little worried that the show was losing its way. Hell no. It’s back, and it’s been as intense and complex as ever. The double length episodes that ended season 2 and started season 3 are nothing short of epic. If I’m gushing, it’s because I was really worried that BSG would devolve into soap operatics and just drag on until its death by cancellation or whatever. I’m not worried anymore. Welcome back, Battlestar Galactica!
p.s. This is my 200th post since moving to Blogger :-) I was going to make a special 200th post, but honestly, who gives a s–t? I had 279 posts on my old LJ site, so this actually makes 479 total posts. Maybe I’ll do a special 500th post, but honestly, I probably won’t remember :-P.
With his “Green Screen Challenge“, Stephen Colbert leveraged the power of YouTube and the DIY community to make some great content for his show (in tonight’s case, a whole show’s worth). He just announced the winner tonight – Bonnie Rose of California (video here). Incidentally, the runner up of the challenge (“not a contest”) was a certain George L. from Marin County, California. George L. got a Stephen Colbert mug and T-shirt as a prize – congrats, George! I did a little digging, however, and it turns out that George L. owns an entire post-production company devoted to special effects. So the deck was a little bit stacked in his favor, no?
George L. was sporting enough to stick around for Colbert’s Tek Janssen cartoon, featuring a 5 minute landing sequence. Sweet. And he stuck around for lightsaber battles at the end of the show. Awesome!
UPDATE: fixed broken link for winning video – sorry!
Very cool high-speed photography video of a lighter in action. The best thing about high-speed photography is how it makes watch commonplace events with a new sense of wonder :-)
I would be remiss if I didn’t point out this line from OpenSecrets’ article on the Israel Lobby:
Note: The Center categorizes individual contributions to candidates as being ideological only under strict conditions. For example, a contribution to a candidate will be considered to be pro-Israel only if the contributor gives to a pro-Israel political action committee AND the candidate has received money from a pro-Israel PAC. Thus, the contribution figures attributed to ideological groups, including pro-Israel and pro-Arab interests, may be artificially low.
However, as I showed in the original post, even if you double, or even triple, the amount contributed by pro-Israel interests, it still doesn’t compare to the big guns – corporations and unions. Note that my original post had the easier task of debunking conspiracy theories claiming that the Israel lobby is the biggest of them all. The numbers show that to be far from true.
Lost in the Foley scandal is this gem:
Sen. Arlen Specter, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, last Monday delivered an unusually candid assessment of the Senate’s notoriously light work schedule.
In a National Press Club luncheon speech, Specter noted it was “very hard to convene a Monday morning hearing” because of extended weekends. He continued: “We’ve fallen into a routine . . . of starting our workweek Tuesday at 2:15 after we finish our caucus luncheons, and people start to get edgy and heading for the airports early on Thursday. So we might increase the workweek by 50 percent, say, to three days.”
As USA Today points out: “Lawmakers will make $165,200 this year. Leaders earn more.”
p.s. The USA Today article also has this gem of a quote:
“I don’t think there’s anything wrong with them being out of Washington,” says John Samples of the Cato Institute, a think tank that favors limited government. “They might be better representatives.”
Absolutely. If you define “representatives” as “Corporate Whores”.